色库TV

Rule 111.1(ii)

  • Article XI
  • Rule 101.2
  • Rule 106.1
  • Rule 11.1
  • Rule 110.1
  • Rule 110.3
  • Rule 111.1(a)
  • Rule 111.1(b)
  • Rule 111.1(gg)
  • Rule 111.1(hh)
  • Rule 111.1(ii)
  • Rule 111.1(jj)
  • Rule 111.2 (e)(i)
  • Rule 111.2 (e)(ii)
  • Rule 111.2 (e)(iii)
  • Rule 111.2(a)
    • Showing 1 - 2 of 2
    2026-UNAT-1620, Margaret Mary Fogarty

    The UNAT found that the neutral first instance process established by the IMO, i.e., the SAB, was properly constituted and met the requirements of Article 2(10) of the UNAT Statute. The UNAT rejected the argument that the SAB lacked neutrality. The UNAT also found that the SAB produced a sufficient written record of its Decision.

    The UNAT found that the SAB acted within the bounds of its jurisdiction and competence when it reviewed the decision of the Secretary-General on the recommendation of the ABCC. The SAB had close regard to the fact that the ABCC reached its determination on the medical...

    2021-UNAT-1117, Margaret Mary Fogarty

    UNAT held that while the SAB may satisfy the requirements of a neutral first instance process, its decision is only advisory or recommendatory. UNAT held that the facts did not disclose whether the Secretary-General of IMO had the power to amend the powers of the SAB retrospectively to permit the SAB to make a decision rather than a recommendation or, more pertinently, by subsequent fiat, to convert a recommendation of SAB into a decision. UNAT held that the source of the Secretary-General’s power to introduce interim measures was not clear and that there may be other constraints upon his...