É«¿âTV

Rule 106.1

  • Article XI
  • Rule 101.2
  • Rule 106.1
  • Rule 11.1
  • Rule 110.1
  • Rule 110.3
  • Rule 111.1(a)
  • Rule 111.1(b)
  • Rule 111.1(gg)
  • Rule 111.1(hh)
  • Rule 111.1(ii)
  • Rule 111.1(jj)
  • Rule 111.2(a)
    • Showing 1 - 1 of 1
    2020-UNAT-1074, Patsy Bello

    UNAT held that the Appellant did not contest the decision to separate her from the Organisation, thus the SAB was not seized with her separation and her appeal on that issue was not receivable. UNAT held that the Appellant’s claims for compensation for pain, suffering, and medical expenses were beyond the scope of the case and therefore not receivable. UNAT held that the IMO Secretary-General’s decision to place the Appellant on sick leave was based on sound medical evidence which was not rebutted at the time and that there was no basis to set aside that decision. UNAT held there was no basis...