É«¿âTV

Rule 111.1(3)

  • Rule 102.2(13)
  • Rule 102.2(14)
  • Rule 110.1
  • Rule 110.1(11)
  • Rule 111.(7)
  • Rule 111.1 (18)
  • Rule 111.1.(8)
  • Rule 111.1(10)
  • Rule 111.1(2)
  • Rule 111.1(20)
  • Rule 111.1(3)
  • Rule 111.1(5)
  • Rule 111.1(6)
    • Showing 1 - 1 of 1
    2017-UNAT-805, Gorelova

    UNAT held that the requirements for UNAT jurisdiction were fulfilled. UNAT held that the appeal to AJAB was time-barred and also, as the Appellant failed to request administrative review under ICAO Staff Rule 111. 1(5), the appeal to AJAB was not receivable ratione materiae. UNAT held that a later request by the Appellant was not relevant to the question of receivability because although the later request was phrased differently, it was based on the same factual and substantive situation that had already been assessed under her previous, unsuccessful request for review of her post description...