2025-UNAT-1537, Aiman Mackie
The UNAT held that the contested decision was a separation decision hinged on expiration of an appointment, and not a termination decision based on abolition of post or reduction of staff. The former staff member did not fall within the category of staff with the right to be considered on a preferential basis for retention and the Administration did not have an obligation to find him an alternative and suitable position following the abolition or reclassification exercise.
The UNAT observed that although the former staff member was informed in his non-renewal letter that he would be placed on...