É«¿âTV

UNDT/2015/094

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Consolidation of applications: The Tribunal concluded that consolidation would not have any effect on the parties’ rights as the two applications are virtually identical and each party will have the opportunity to have its case fully considered both as to receivability and on the merits albeit in one judgment. Receivability of the classification decision: Noting that Fuentes UNDT-2010-064 and Fuentes 2011-UNAT-105 confirm that a failure to decide an appeal against classification of a post encumbered by the Applicant is an administrative decision which may be subject to review by the Tribunal without the necessity for the Applicant to have recourse to management evaluation, the Tribunal found the Applicant’s challenge to the classification process receivable.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant filed two applications contesting a decision of the United Nations Mission in Liberia not to extend his contract and the failure to conduct a proper classification review. The Respondent submitted that the Applicant’s classification appeal is not receivable rationae materiae as the Applicant failed to wait for the 45 day period for management evaluation to expire prior to filing the Application. In addition the Respondent alleged that the Applicant had not exhausted internal remedies because there has been no final decision of the Classification Appeals Committee (CAC).

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Torkornoo