{"id":190123,"date":"1998-11-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2019-03-11T22:43:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/?p=190123"},"modified":"2019-03-11T22:43:00","modified_gmt":"2019-03-11T22:43:00","slug":"auto-insert-190123","status":"publish","type":"document","link":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/document\/auto-insert-190123\/","title":{"rendered":"Israeli practices – SpCttee periodic report\/Addendum"},"content":{"rendered":"
Report of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n Note by the Secretary-General<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n Addendum<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n \t<\/span>The Secretary-General has the honour to transmit to the members of the General Assembly the attached periodic report covering the period from 1 January to 31 May 1998, which was submitted to him, in accordance with paragraphs 5, 6 and 7 of Assembly resolution 52\/64 A of 10 December 1997, by the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories.<\/p><\/div>\n \n<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n Contents<\/p><\/div>\n \n Paragraphs<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Page<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n Letter of transmittal<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 3<\/p>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n I.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n II.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Introduction<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Information received by the Special Committee<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 1-4<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 5-363<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 4<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 4<\/p>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n A.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n General situation<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 5-148 <\/p>\n<\/td>\n 4<\/p>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 1.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 2.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n General developments and policy statements<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Incidents resulting from the occupation<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 5-60<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 61-148<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 4<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 11<\/p>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n (a)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n (b)<\/p>\n (c)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n List of Palestinians killed by troops or Israeli civilians<\/p>\n <\/p>\n List of other Palestinians killed as a result of the<\/p>\n occupation<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Other incidents<\/p>\n<\/td>\n <\/p>\n 62-148<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 12<\/p>\n 13<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 13<\/p>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n B.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Administration of justice, including the right to a fair trial<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 149-176<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 26<\/p>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 1.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 2.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Palestinian population<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Israelis<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 149-176<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 168-176<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 26<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 29<\/p>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n C.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Treatment of civilians<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 177-270<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 30<\/p>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 1.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n General developments<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 177-230<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 30<\/p>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n (a)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n (b)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Harassment and physical ill-treatment<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Collective punishment<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 177-182<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 183-202<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 30<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 32<\/p>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n (i)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n (ii)<\/p>\n (iii)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Houses or rooms that were demolished or sealed<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Imposition of curfews, sealing off or closing of areas<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Other forms of collective punishment<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 183-189<\/p>\n 190-197<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 198-202<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 32<\/p>\n 33<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 33<\/p>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n (c)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n (d)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n (e)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n (f)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Expulsions<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Economic and social situation<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Situation of children<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Other developments<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 203<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 204-219<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 220-223<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 224-230<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 34<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 34<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 37<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 38<\/p>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 2.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Measures affecting certain fundamental freedoms<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 231-250<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 39<\/p>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n (a)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n (b)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n (c)<\/p>\n <\/p>\n (d)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Freedom of movement<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Freedom of education<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Freedom of religion<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Freedom of expression<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 231-237<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 238-239<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 240-247<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 248-250<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 39<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 39<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 40<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 41<\/p>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n 3.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Information on the activities of settlers affecting the<\/p>\n civilian population<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 251-270<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 41<\/p>\n <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n D.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n E.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n F.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n Situation of detainees and prisoners<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Annexation and settlement<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Information concerning the occupied Syrian Arab Golan<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 271-294<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 295-352<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 353-363<\/p>\n<\/td>\n 44<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 47<\/p>\n <\/p>\n 55<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n \t<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n \n<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n Letter of transmittal<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n 5 November 1998<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n Sir,<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n \t<\/span>The Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories has the honour to transmit to you herewith, in accordance with paragraphs 5, 6 and 7 of General Assembly resolution 52\/64 A of 10 December 1997, a periodic report updating information contained in the thirtieth report, of which it adopted and presented to you on 4 March 1998 (A\/53\/136). The present periodic report has been prepared in order to bring to your attention, and to the attention of the General Assembly, updated information on the human rights situation in the occupied territories.<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n \t<\/span>The present periodic report covers the period from 1 January to 31 May 1998. It is based on written information gathered from various sources among which the Special Committee has selected relevant excerpts and summaries, which are reflected in the report.<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n \t<\/span>Accept, Sir, the assurances of my highest consideration.<\/p><\/div>\n (Signed) John de Saram<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n Chairman of the Special Committee to<\/p><\/div>\n Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting<\/p><\/div>\n the Human Rights of the Palestinian<\/p><\/div>\n People and Other Arabs of the<\/p><\/div>\n Occupied Territories<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n His Excellency Mr. Kofi Annan<\/p><\/div>\n Secretary-General of the United Nations<\/p><\/div>\n New York<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n <\/p>\n \t<\/span>I.\t<\/span> Introduction<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n 1.\t\t<\/span>In its resolution 52\/64 of 10 December 1997, the General Assembly:<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n \t<\/span>"5.\t<\/span>Requests the Special Committee, pending complete termination of the Israeli occupation, to continue to investigate Israeli policies and practices in the occupied Palestinian territory, including Jerusalem, and other Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967, especially Israeli lack of compliance with the provisions of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949, and to consult, as appropriate, with the International Committee of the Red Cross according to its regulations in order to ensure that the welfare and human rights of the peoples of the occupied territories are safeguarded and to report to the Secretary-General as soon as possible and whenever the need arises thereafter;<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n \t<\/span>"6.\t<\/span>Also requests the Special Committee to submit regularly to the Secretary-General periodic reports on the current situation in the occupied Palestinian territory, including Jerusalem;<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n \t<\/span>"7.\t<\/span>Further requests the Special Committee to continue to investigate the treatment of prisoners in the occupied Palestinian territory, including Jerusalem, and other Arab territories occupied by Israel since 1967."<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 2.\t\t<\/span>The Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories continued its work under the rules of procedure contained in its first report to the Secretary-General and held the second of its series of meetings from 30 May to 9 June 1998 at Geneva, Cairo, Amman and Damascus. On 28 May 1998, the Permanent Mission of Sri Lanka to the United Nations informed the Secretariat of the United Nations (Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights) that the Government of Sri Lanka had appointed John de Saram, Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the United Nations, as its representative to serve on the Special Committee, with immediate effect, in place of Janaka Nakkawita. The second series of meetings was therefore attended by John de Saram (Sri Lanka), who acted as Chairman, Absa Claude Diallo (Senegal) and Dato' Abdul Majid Mohamed (Malaysia).<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 3.\t\t<\/span>The situation in the Arab territories occupied by Israel, as it affects the human rights of the civilian population, is described in section II of the present report. The information contained in the report reflects written information received by the Special Committee during the period from 1 January to 31 May 1998. The Special Committee has followed the situation in the occupied territories on a day-to-day basis by means of reports appearing in the Israeli press and in the Arab-language and English-language newspapers published in the occupied territories. It has also examined a number of communications and reports from Governments, organizations and individuals pertaining to the period covered by the report.<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 4.\t\t<\/span>The geographical names and the terminology employed in the present report reflect the usage in the original sources and do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Special Committee or the Secretariat of the United Nations.<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n II.\t<\/span>Information received by the Special Committee<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n \t<\/span>A.\t<\/span>General situation<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n \t<\/span>1.\t<\/span>General developments and policy statements<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 5.\t\t<\/span>On 5 January 1998, the Minister of Local Government of the Palestinian Authority, Sa'eb Erekat, condemned an Israeli decision to freeze the full reopening of Hebron's Shehada Street and to reinforce Israeli security arrangements in the area. Shehada Street is a major artery in Hebron, linking the part under the control of the Palestinian Authority to the Israeli-controlled sector. (The Jerusalem Times, 9 January)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 6.\t\t<\/span>On 8 January, in a speech made in Jerusalem before Jewish parliamentarians from all over the world, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated that Israel refused to revert to the pre-June 1967 armistice lines on the grounds that it could not "go back to being a country that was 10 or 12 kilometres wide". In an appeal to the Palestinian Authority, the Prime Minister also declared that if the Palestinian Authority fulfilled its obligations, such as fighting "terrorism", dismantling "terrorist" infrastructure, confiscating weapons, annulling the articles in the Charter of the Palestine Liberation Organization which called for Israel's destruction, and stopping incitement, Israel would offer a further redeployment. (Jerusalem Post, 9 January)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 7.\t\t<\/span>On 8 January, the Palestinian Authority condemned Israel's announcement of the expansion of the Efrat settlement in the West Bank through the addition of 600 housing units. Efrat lies to the south of Bethlehem on land belonging to the village of Al Khadr. (The Jerusalem Times, 16 January)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 8.\t\t<\/span>On 12 January, the Palestinian Authority General Intelligence raided a warehouse in Nablus where Hamas activists were mixing chemicals for makeshift bombs. Four men in their early twenties were arrested. (The Jerusalem Times, 16 January)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 9.\t\t<\/span>On 13 January, the Cabinet reached an agreement on a document spelling out the Palestinian Authority's obligations to maintain security and dismantle the "terrorist" infrastructure in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. It made the fulfilment of these conditions an irrevocable prerequisite for any future withdrawals by the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF). The Cabinet also appointed an inter-ministerial team, consisting of IDF and General Security Service (GSS) personnel, as well as representatives of the Foreign and Internal Security Ministries, to monitor Palestinian compliance. The list of demands set by Israel as a precondition to its redeployment in the territories was rejected by the Palestinians on the grounds that they had honoured all their obligations. Chief Palestinian negotiator Nabil Sha'ath accused Israel of deception, of "concocting a ploy to make sure that it would not have to implement anything at all". According to Mr. Sha'ath, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was unable to carry out new military redeployment, as required under the Oslo Accords, because of the opposition of several ministers in his Cabinet. (Ha'aretz, Jerusalem Post, 14 January)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 10.\t\t<\/span>On 20 January, during a meeting with President Bill Clinton of the United States of America in Washington, D.C., Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejected a withdrawal from more than 9.5 per cent of the West Bank on the grounds that he did not have a mandate from his Cabinet for a larger pull-back, which could jeopardize Israel's security interests. (Ha'aretz, 22 January)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 11.\t\t<\/span>On 23 January, it was reported that the Gush Shalom (色库TV Block) movement had distributed a list of Israeli violations of the Oslo and Hebron Accords which was longer than the list of the Palestinian violations compiled by the Israeli Cabinet. Examples included in the list were the safe passages between the West Bank and Gaza Strip, which Gush Shalom claimed should have been implemented in September 1994; the promised release of all Palestinian prisoners who had served two thirds of their sentences; and the abolition of the Civil Administration in the West Bank. (Jerusalem Post, 23 January)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 12.\t\t<\/span>On 24 January, Hamas leader Sheikh Ahmad Yassin called on Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat to join his movement in waging a "holy war" against the "occupiers". Sheikh Yassin called on all the Palestinians to unite in an armed struggle against Israel, charging that this was the only way left to the Palestinians to gain their rights and achieve their goals. (Jerusalem Post, 25 January)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 13.\t\t<\/span>On 25 January, Israel's insistence that the Palestinian Covenant be revised by the Palestine National Council was reiterated by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's communications adviser David Bar Illan. He stated that the Covenant revision was a sine qua non for any further IDF redeployment in the territories. Palestinian officials rejected Israel's demand on the grounds that articles calling for the destruction of Israel had already been annulled in 1996. (Jerusalem Post, 26 January)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 14.\t\t<\/span>On 27 January, Internal Security Minister Avigdor Kahalani pledged to deploy an additional 200 police officers in Jerusalem's Old City and to boost security measures there. "We are planning to install closed-circuit television which will enable us to view most of the streets in the Old City," he announced, indicating that the number of blue (regular) police and the green (border) policemen would also be increased. The Government is said to have been pledging additional security in the Old City for some time, especially following the murder of a yeshiva student there on 20 November. (Jerusalem Post, 28 January)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 15.\t\t<\/span>On 27 January, it was reported that a new study book for elementary schools issued by the Ministry of Education to mark the fiftieth anniversary of the foundation of the State of Israel ignored completely the existence of the Palestinian people in Israel, the conflict with the Palestinians before and after the creation of Israel, as well as the peace process with the Palestinians over the past years. The book presented the basic concepts of independence and sovereignty, such as the Proclamations of Independence, the States symbol, the Israeli flag and the national anthem. It surveyed major events in the history of Israel, especially the wars with the Arab States, the absorption of immigration and the peace process. The chapter on the wars of Israel states that the War of Independence broke out when "Arab armies invaded the country and attacked communities and highways. Our soldiers repulsed them and tried to break the siege of Jerusalem. Our forces took control of the centre of the country, the Galilee and the area stretching from the Negev to Eilat. The Old City fell to Jordan". The passage did not mention the long fights between the Jewish settlement fighters and the Palestinians during the first months of the war and ignored the fact that the Arabs had declared war because of their opposition to the Partition Plan, which envisaged the establishment of two States, Jewish and Arab, side by side. The chapter on the "peace process between Israel and the Arab countries", tells of the treaties signed with Egypt and Jordan. The Oslo Agreements and the peace process with the Palestinians, even the very existence of the Palestinians, were not mentioned at all. (Ha'aretz, 27 January)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 16.\t\t<\/span>On 30 January, it was reported that the Israeli police had set up a new border guard unit post in the Christian Quarter of the Old City of Jerusalem. Israeli sources said the decision was made within the framework of a plan to redeploy inside the Old City in the wake of the killing of a settler two months earlier. (The Jerusalem Times, 30 January)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 17.\t\t<\/span>On 12 February, Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat threatened that the intifada would be renewed and that he would "cross out" the peace accords with Israel if negotiations failed. He also stated that he would declare a Palestinian state in 1999 regardless of the outcome of the peace talks. Mr. Arafat spoke in Ramallah to 400 Palestinians, including Legislative Council members and a delegation of Israeli Arabs, to mark the start of the commemorations of the fiftieth anniversary of the 1948 "Catastrophe" that led to thousands of Palestinians abandoning or being forced out of their homes. Palestinian Authority Minister of Information and Cultural Affairs, Yasser Abed Rabbo, stated that despite the tragedy and suffering, the meeting symbolized the unity of the Palestinian people who were entitled to return to their homeland and seek self-determination and statehood with Jerusalem as the capital. Mr. Arafat's statements drew sharp criticism from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu who stated that they were in violation of the Oslo Accords and would lead to their cancellation. (Ha'aretz, Jerusalem Post, 13 February; Ha'aretz, 15 February)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 18.\t\t<\/span>On 17 February, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu repeated his determination to insist on his demand that "terrorists" residing in the autonomous areas be handed over to Israel. Speaking at a meeting in the Knesset with families of "terror" victims, Mr. Netanyahu stated that the Palestinian Authority had to know that if it did not abide by this demand it could not expect any diplomatic returns. The Knesset later endorsed, by a vote of 15 to 3, a concluding statement which averred that "as long as the Palestinian Authority does not fulfil its commitment (to hand over terrorists) within the framework of the Oslo Accords and the written appendices to the Hebron Agreement, Israel will not see itself obliged to fulfil its commitments within the framework of Oslo and will take all legal steps it sees fit to eradicate terror and ensure the security of its citizens". (Jerusalem Post, 18 February)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 19.\t\t<\/span>On 23 February, it was reported that the Government stood by its position that Israel should retain 64 per cent of the occupied territories during the interim phase of the implementation of the Oslo Accords as a bargaining chip for the final status negotiations. The Palestinian Authority is said to have partial control over 24 per cent of the territories and full sovereignty over 3 per cent of the remaining land. (Ha'aretz, 23 February)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 20.\t\t<\/span>On 6 March, it was reported that a census by the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS) revealed a larger than expected population in the West Bank and Gaza. According to Israeli estimates, the population figure was approximately 2.4 million in the West Bank and Gaza and about 170,000 in East Jerusalem. The PCBS figures are at odds with Israeli estimates which state that there are 2.9 million people in the West Bank and Gaza and 323,000 in East Jerusalem. This figure does not include 325,000 Palestinians who have residency rights in the West Bank and Gaza but have been living abroad for over one year. (The Jerusalem Times, 6 March)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 21.\t\t<\/span>On 12 March, in a direct appeal to Palestinians, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the killing of three Palestinian workers by IDF soldiers at the Tarkumiya roadblock on 10 March "a tragic mistake". He defended, however, the action of the soldiers, stating that they believed they were the target of a "terrorist" attack. Stating that he understood the Palestinians' pain, he called for peace talks to be resumed in order to bring a future of peace and hope for the two peoples and prevent new tragedies. Mr. Netanyahu's remarks were intended to help end Palestinian protests which had swept the West Bank since the incident. (Ha'aretz, Jerusalem Post, 13 March)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 22.\t\t<\/span>On 13 March, Sheikh Hamed Bitawi stated that the incident in Tarkumiya in which three Palestinian workers were killed by IDF gunfire was tantamount to a "massacre" carried out by Zionist occupiers and added that coexistence between the Palestinians and Israel was impossible. (Jerusalem Post, 15 March)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 23.\t\t<\/span>On 15 March, a senior Israeli official stated that the very fact that British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook intended to begin his visit to Jerusalem the following day with a tour of the Har Homa settlement was "a provocation that supports the Palestinian claim to part of Jerusalem even before the final status talks begin". The source contended that a tour of this kind was something that had never been done before by any other visiting officials and doubted that a similar act would be carried out anywhere else in the world. Mr. Cook, who stated at first that he would visit the site with Palestinian Authority Minister for Jerusalem Affairs, Faisal Husseini, later recanted under Israeli pressure and stated that he would make a private visit to the site. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu vowed that Israel would soon begin the construction of the controversial neighbourhood. Mr. Netanyahu reiterated his Government's commitment to preserve Jerusalem's current status as the undivided national capital. "Jerusalem", he declared, "remains and will remain forever the indisputable, indivisible capital of Israel". In another development, government officials rejected Mr. Cook's reported advocacy of an IDF withdrawal in the West Bank which would involve handing over to the Palestinian Authority 20 per cent of Area B and 20 per cent of Area C. Internal Security Minister Avigdor Kahalani stated that a pull-back of this magnitude would be a direct blow to Israel's security, indicating that he favoured an evacuation of between 5 per cent and 10 per cent of the areas in question. Speaking in his capacity as chairman of the Third Way movement, Mr. Kahalani also stated that the American proposal of withdrawal from 13 per cent of the West Bank was also detrimental to national security. (Jerusalem Post, 16-17 March)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 24.\t\t<\/span>On 15 March, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told the Cabinet that there was a worrying escalation of incidents in the territories, partly owing to the Tarkumiya incident (in which three Palestinian workers were killed by IDF gunfire). He also stated that he regarded as very serious an incident in which shots were fired from the Palestinian-controlled sector of Hebron into the Jewish quarter and demanded that the Palestinian Authority take firm action to prevent such incidents from recurring. (Ha'aretz, 16 March)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 25.\t\t<\/span>On 15 March, Ariel Sharon reportedly stated on Israeli television that Israel had not given up on plans to liquidate the head of the Hamas Political Bureau, Khaled Mishal, presently located at Amman. In the wake of the recent Israeli-Jordanian crisis owing to the botched assassination attempt on Mishal in October 1997, the Infrastructure Minister said explicitly that the attempt at liquidation would not occur on Jordanian soil. (The Jerusalem Times, 20 March)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 26.\t\t<\/span>On 16 March, the West Bank Preventive Security Chief, Jibril Rajoub, warned that settlers entering any Palestinian Authority-controlled area with the intent of harming Palestinians would not leave alive. He also stated that he was suspending security cooperation with IDF in Hebron until further notice. Mr. Rajoub made his statements following an incident in Hebron's Abu Sneinah neighbourhood, during which some 30 settlers smashed the windshields of Palestinian cars and stoned and beat residents. His declarations brought angry reactions from Israeli governmental officials and settlers. "Grave threats lead to an escalation and hot-headedness at a time when we all need to concern ourselves with calming the atmosphere", Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated, adding that the Palestinians did not want to make progress in the peace talks. Noam Arnon, the spokesman for the Hebron Jewish community, stated that Rajoub's remarks exposed the "barbaric and terrorist nature of the Palestinian Authority". "Murders remain murders", he charged, adding that the bubble of the Hebron Accord illusion had finally burst. Aharon Domb, Director-General of the Council of Jewish Communities in Judea, Samaria (West Bank) and Gaza, declared that "a terrorist wearing a police uniform remains a terrorist". (Ha'aretz, Jerusalem Post, 17 March)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 27.\t\t<\/span>In his speech on 16 March reacting to the Tarkumiya incident, West Bank Preventive Security Chief Jibril Rajoub demanded that Israel bring to justice those responsible for the killing of three Palestinian victims. He noted that in Israeli prisons there were no Israelis convicted of killing Palestinians. Rajoub stressed there would not be any security cooperation with IDF in the Hebron area until after those responsible for the Tarkumiya killings were put on trial. (The Jerusalem Times, 20 March)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 28.\t\t<\/span>On 18 March, referring to British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook's controversial visit to Har Homa (in Jerusalem), Labour Party Chairman, Ehud Barak, stated that Har Homa was not a settlement. "There is no shred of a doubt regarding our right to construct there", he declared, explaining that Har Homa was unequivocally within the Jerusalem city limits and that all Israeli governments, including Labour, upheld Israel's right to build there. He concluded by stating that a united Jerusalem under full Israeli sovereignty was at the very heart of the Israeli national consensus. (Jerusalem Post, 19 March)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 29.\t\t<\/span>On 24 March, it was reported that the security services had recently stepped up their level of alert in response to warnings of impending attacks by Hamas and the Islamic Jihad in Israeli cities and against settlers in the occupied territories. At a recent strategy session, security sources evaluated a series of events over the previous 10 days that were conducive to the new state of heightened alert. These included the incident at the Tarkumiya roadblock where three Palestinians were mistakenly shot dead by soldiers; the growing unrest on the Palestinian streets; the violent eviction of Palestinian "squatter" families by IDF from Israeli-controlled territory; and the deadlock in the peace process. Security sources reportedly stated that the situation in the territories was worse than ever. They claimed that there was growing distrust between Israelis and Palestinians and that Hamas, which had suffered several setbacks at the hands of GSS over the year, was now making a complete recovery by taking over the Palestinian streets. A worrisome indication of this development, according to the sources, was that Hamas had recruited many female university chemistry students into its ranks over the previous months. Finally, they warned that a "terrorist" attack launched from the controlled areas by the Palestinian Authority against Israel would cause the complete collapse of the peace process. (Jerusalem Post, 24 March)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 30.\t\t<\/span>On 5 April, the Palestinian Authority arrested three Palestinian men in connection with the assassination of top Hamas activist, Mehyeddin Sharif, on 29 March . According to the West Bank Preventive Security Chief Jibril Rajoub, the three men killed Sharif in an internal power struggle. All were members of the military wing of Hamas, the Izz Al-din al-Qassam brigades. (The Jerusalem Times, 10 April)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 31.\t\t<\/span>On 6 April, the Government issued a statement accusing the Palestinian Authority of violating the Oslo Accords by being involved in the killing of Palestinians suspected of collaborating with Israel. According to the statement, 67 Palestinians had been killed and 96 injured since the establishment of the Palestinian Authority in 1994. Israeli officials charged that the Palestinian Authority put most of its intelligence effort into monitoring and interrogating suspected Palestinian collaborators. The Government statement indicated that the killing of collaborators violated article XVI of the 1995 Oslo II Accord, which stipulates that Palestinians who have maintained contact with the Israeli authorities would not be subjected to acts of harassment, violence, retribution or prosecution and that appropriate ongoing measures would be taken in coordination with Israel in order to ensure their protection. Palestinian Authority officials were not available for comment on the Israeli Government's allegations. In the past, however, the Palestinian Authority denied responsibility for the killing of collaborators, blaming their death on personal feuds. (Ha'aretz, Jerusalem Post, 7 April)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 32.\t\t<\/span>On 8 April, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu described a letter by the 色库TV Now movement to the United States administration calling for reinforced American efforts to restart the stalled peace process a "disgraceful spectacle". "This spectacle of going to a foreign power so that it will put pressure on Israel", he charged, "is disgraceful". (Jerusalem Post, 9 April)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 33.\t\t<\/span>On 9 April, Hamas leader Abdel Aziz Rantisi who resides in Gaza, stated that Hamas would blame Israel for the killing of activist Sharif a few days earlier. (The Jerusalem Times, 10 April)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 34.\t\t<\/span>On 12 April, Pope John Paul II condemned what he described as "the dangerous political options regarding Jerusalem which were threatening peace in the Middle East". Diplomatic sources in Rome stated that the Pope had alluded to the Israeli construction in East Jerusalem. (Ha'aretz, 13 April)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 35.\t\t<\/span>On 14 April, the Israeli Minister of Infrastructure, Ariel Sharon, presented the Government with a plan providing for the setting up of six new settlements along the "Green Line". Palestinian sources indicated that the new settlement plan is known as "The surroundings of Hebron". According to Palestinian sources, the plan aims to encircle Palestinian towns near the 1967 borders and to set up a row of Jewish settlements to act as a buffer between the Palestinian towns and the State of Israel. (The Jerusalem Times, 24 April)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 36.\t\t<\/span>On 17 April, it was reported that, according to a study published by the Palestine branch of Defence for Children International, a total of 464 Palestinians in the occupied territories were killed or injured by mines and leftover military material over the past 30 years. The report covered the period from June 1967 through February. Of the 464 victims, 144 were killed as a result of explosions, while 320 were wounded. (The Jerusalem Times, 18 April)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 37.\t\t<\/span>On 18 April, Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat vowed that he would declare statehood in 1999 and implied that the Palestinians could turn to violence if their demands were not met. In an interview broadcast by the Palestinian Authority television, President Arafat stated "we are not in a hurry (but) patience is limited. In 1999 we will announce a state". (Jerusalem Post, 19 April)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 38.\t\t<\/span>On 20 April, Deputy Prime Minister Abdullah Ensour of Jordan stated that King Hussein had warned Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that the Middle East could be plunged into "destructive darkness" unless peace talks with the Palestinians made progress. (Jerusalem Post, 21 April)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 39.\t\t<\/span>On 20 April, several ministers of the Israeli Government demanded that the restrictions imposed on settlers concerning open-fire regulations be annulled. Their demand came after an incident in which a Jewish settler from Ma'aon was allegedly killed by Bedouin shepherds in a dispute over land on southern Mount Hebron. The incident reportedly generated fierce criticism from settlers, who blamed the State Attorney's Office and the police for creating an atmosphere that forced them "to think twice before opening fire". (Ha'aretz, Jerusalem Post, 21 April)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 40.\t\t<\/span>On 21 April, Government officials stated that the Palestinian Authority had deployed 16,000 more police officers than are allowed by the Oslo Accords, making the Palestinian Authority-controlled areas one of the most heavily policed areas in the world (while Switzerland has two officers per 1,000 residents and Spain 4.5, the Palestinian Authority has 16.7 policemen per 1,000 residents). The Palestinian Authority is allowed to deploy up to 24,000 policemen in the West Bank and Gaza Strip under the 1995 interim agreement. Israeli officials stated, however, that it had employed 40,000 officers, 66 per cent more than are allowed. (Jerusalem Post, 22 April)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 41.\t\t<\/span>On 22 April, the Secretary-General of the United Nations, Kofi Annan, stated that there was concern that the current impasse in the peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians could lead to further violence in the region. Mr. Annan stated that there was considerable frustration among Arab leaders at the lack of progress in the peace process, adding that there was concern that desperate people would resort to violence again unless some progress were made. (Jerusalem Post, 23 April)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 42.\t\t<\/span>On 23 April, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu threatened to annex parts of the West Bank should Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat unilaterally declare the establishment of a Palestinian state. (Ha'aretz, 24 April)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 43.\t\t<\/span>On 28 April, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was quoted as stating that giving up 6 per cent of the West Bank was "no problem", but that when the limit of 7 or 8 per cent was passed, this became "very difficult". Mr. Netanyahu explained that returning to the Palestinians more that 9 per cent of the land would make it very difficult to protect 40,000 Israeli children who travelled through the West Bank every day. Minister of Infrastructure Ariel Sharon also described the evacuation of more than 9 per cent as "dangerous", indicating that it was essential for Israel to extricate itself from what he described as "the percentage marketplace". Mr. Sharon also warned that attempts to accelerate the process of transferring land to the Palestinians could entail the loss of water resources or sites designated for the installation of early warning devices. (Jerusalem Post, 28 April)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 44.\t\t<\/span>On 2 May, an estimated 10,000 to 15,000 right-wing activists laid a symbolic cornerstone at Har Homa (Jebel Abu Ghneim) and pressed the Government to move ahead with construction there. Among the demonstrators was the head of the Land of Israel Front, Member of the Knesset (MK) Michael Kleiner, who quoted from the sources the story of the Jew who had inherited a pigsty: "The question was what the Jew should do with the pigsty. Shall he get rid of it and lose the inheritance, or shall he keep it? The Talmud determined that he should get rid of it, but little by little, so as not to sustain a great loss". The moral of the fable, according to Mr. Kleiner, was that "the Oslo Accords Netanyahu had inherited could also be done away with little by little, in order to minimize the damage". A counter-demonstration by some 1,000 left-wing activists calling for a halt to the construction of the settlement was held in the wadi below. (Ha'aretz, Jerusalem Post, 3 May)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 45.\t\t<\/span>On 3 May, the Council of Jewish Communities in Judea, Samaria (West Bank) and Gaza and the parliamentary Land of Israel Front threatened to topple the Government in case of a second-phase withdrawal from the West Bank. (Jerusalem Post, 4 May)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 46.\t\t<\/span>On 11 May, Egyptian Foreign Minister Amr Moussa stated that the Middle East peace process was embroiled in its deepest crisis ever. "We are in the midst of an unprecedented crisis since the beginning of the peace process", Mr. Moussa told Egypt's Nile Television, adding that the current Israeli policies did not augur well for the future of the region. (Jerusalem Post, 12 May)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 47.\t\t<\/span>On 12 May, Labour Party chairman Ehud Barak declared that Beit El, Ofra and other settlements "are here to stay forever". He stated that his Party had a set of red lines which it would cross under no circumstances. This included a united Jerusalem under full and unequivocal Israeli sovereignty and a settler population which would remain under Israeli rule in large settlement blocks. "Under no circumstances", he promised, "will Israel return to the 1967 borders". Mr. Barak, who made his statements during a tour of five settlements in Judea and Samaria (West Bank), had warm words for settlers and settlements: "I came here to see how the settlements have developed. It is heartening to see so much growth and progress. There are beautiful projects here the beauty is not only in the projects but is connected to the soul, the soul of Israeli society". Mr. Barak's statements excited favourable comments from settlers. The head of Jewish Communities in Judea and Samaria (West Bank) and Gaza, Pinhas Walerstein, stated that he would begin looking for a home for Mr. Barak in the Beit El settlement. Other settlers noted that neither Yitzhak Rabin nor Shimon Peres had made comments like Barak's when they were Prime Ministers. 色库TV Now issued a statement expressing "shock and dismay" at Mr. Barak's remarks. (Ha'aretz, Jerusalem Post, 13 May)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 48.\t\t<\/span>On 14 May, the Palestinian commemoration to mark the fiftieth anniversary of Al-Naqba ("the Catastrophe"), that is, the founding of the State of Israel, turned into a bloodbath in which at least seven Palestinians were killed and hundreds more injured during clashes with IDF troops in the territories. (Ha'aretz, Jerusalem Post, 15 May)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 49.\t\t<\/span>On 14 May, it was reported that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had ordered the police to prepare a detailed new security plan for Jerusalem's Old City. The plan is to include stationary police points which would be able to maintain eye contact with one another along the main thoroughfare from the Western Wall to the Damascus and Jaffa Gates. Mr. Netanyahu's directives followed the stabbing to death of a yeshiva student on his way to sunrise services at the Western Wall on 6 May. (Jerusalem Post, 14 May)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 50.\t\t<\/span>On 14 May, the Director-General of the Ministry of Agriculture, Dani Kritzman, stated that should the European Union revoke trade benefits for settler agricultural produce, the Ministry of Agriculture would revoke all the benefits and advantages given to Palestinian agricultural produce under the Paris Agreements. "I personally undertake not to implement the Paris Accords if this is what the Europeans decide. They have to take into account that I am holding the Paris Agreements hostage", Mr. Kritzman stated, bringing home his point by adding that "should the European Union implement sanctions against Israel or decide that it could define Israel's borders, not a single Palestinian tomato would enter Israel duty-free". Meanwhile, the Ministry was reportedly studying measures and ways to permit continued agricultural export from settlements in the event of approval of the European Commissions recommendations by the Foreign Ministers of the European Union. The measures would make the identification of the origin of the produce impossible. Among other things, the Ministry was examining the possibility of marketing settler produce with labels of farms within the Green Line. (Ha'aretz, 15 May)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 51.\t\t<\/span>On 15 May, it was reported that the spiritual leader of Hamas, Sheikh Ahmad Yassin, had condemned the Oslo Accords and stated that suicide bombings against Israel would continue. Sheikh Yassin made the statement while on a shuttle tour of the Middle East. (The Jerusalem Times, 15 May)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 52.\t\t<\/span>On 16 May, King Hussein of Jordan criticized what he described as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's contradictory attitudes towards peace and stated that Israel was slipping into a fortress mentality. The King was apparently referring to comments by Mr. Netanyahu defending his reluctance to make further withdrawals from the West Bank on the grounds that this exposed Israel to security risks which could not be overlooked for the sake of a peace accord. In a related development, the Group of Eight expressed concern at the stalemate in the Middle East peace process, warning that a continued deadlock could have serious consequences throughout the region. (Jerusalem Post, 17 May)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 53.\t\t<\/span>On 19 May, the spokesman for the Israeli human rights organization, B'tselem Yuval Ginbar, said at a press conference that most of those subjected to torture by the Israeli General Security Service, the Shin Bet, were subsequently found innocent and released from prison. (The Jerusalem Times, 22 May)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 54.\t\t<\/span>On 20 May, a bench of nine High Court judges expressed their annoyance at the fact that the Government and Knesset avoided passing a bill which would regulate the special interrogation methods of the General Security Service, forcing the Court to decide on the matter instead. The Justices made their statement during a hearing of six petitions against the legality of such methods. It was the first time the High Court agreed to deal in principle with the question of GSS interrogation techniques. One of the petitions, submitted by the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel, called for a ban on the use of a technique whereby the detainees' hands and feet were bound and a sack placed on their heads, a position in which they were forced to listen to loud music, were deprived of sleep or forced to sit on a small chair. Another petition, submitted by the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI), called for a ban on violent shaking. The State Attorney's representative, Lawyer Shai Nitzan, argued in response that the use of these interrogation methods was permitted under what the law described as "necessary defence", which meant that a man was relieved of criminal responsibility for an action which he was required to carry out on the spot to save his life, body or property, or those of another, from the danger of serious injury while there was no other way to prevent it. Lawyer Nitzan argued that if the Court accepted the ACRI request for a total ban on violent shaking, it would in essence be throwing out the "necessary defence" argument altogether. That would mean that no matter how crucial the information a detainee possessed was, interrogators would never be allowed to use illegal methods to extract it. Court President Aharon Barak rejected this argument, however, stating that there was a difference between the fact that the "necessary defence" was anchored in law and the insistence that it be granted automatically in advance. Justice Dalia Dorner stated that granting automatic immunity could only be done through legislation. The fact that there was no mention of these interrogation methods in the GSS bill pending in the Knesset, she noted, was astonishing because this was exactly the core of the problem. (Ha'aretz, Jerusalem Post, 21 May)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 55.\t\t<\/span>On 20 May, the Israeli High Court of Justice decided to postpone until further notice issuing a verdict on whether Israel's security service, the Shin Bet, was to be allowed to continue using torture methods against Palestinians suspected of security offences. The judges also stated that the issue of whether torture was to be banned needed to be decided jointly by the Israeli Government and the Knesset, and not thrust upon on the shoulders of the High Court of Justice. (The Jerusalem Times, 22 May)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 56.\t\t<\/span>On 22 May, Hamas spiritual leader Sheikh Ahmad Yassin stated that Palestinian suicide bombings would continue regardless of any Israeli troop withdrawal from the West Bank. Yassin made the statement during the Damascus leg of his tour of Muslim countries, which was aimed at promoting the Hamas movement. (Jerusalem Post, 24 May)<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n 57.
<\/p>\n\n
\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n \n \n \n <\/td>\n <\/p>\n <\/td>\n <\/p>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n <\/td>\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/td>\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/td>\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n \n \n \n \n \n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n \n \n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n \n <\/td>\n \n \n \n \n
<\/p>\n
\n<\/p><\/div>\n