2023-UNAT-1402, Faten Hatim Al Dawoud
The UNAT considered an appeal by the staff member.
The UNAT held that the UNRWA DT’s reasoning for refusing an oral hearing because the staff member failed to establish that her appeal was receivable, was ex post facto and, thereby, erroneous.
The UNAT found that there was an error in the UNRWA DT’s calculation of compensation in lieu of rescission of the non-selection decision as there was no evidence to support the conclusion that the UNRWA would have found her unsuitable for the role at the end of the probationary period.
The UNAT was of the view that the UNRWA DT’s methodology of fixing...